🧭DYORCryptoOpsec

Dolomite

DOLODeFi protocol✓ verified✓ audited
scored from the board run of 2026-10-08. dolomite. Run a live analysis
🏷️ Cash-flow app, judged on fees, revenue, TVL, and value accrual.
28.8/100
D (avoid)
coverage 47%, medium confidence, 100% tier-stable, rank #56/67
Share:Post on X
Compare with other tokens
Price
$0.0306
Market cap
$15.70M
FDV
$30.58M
24h volume
$3.99M
24h change
+2.1%
From ATH
-92%
Circulating
512.51M
Total supply
998.43M

Price

Loading...

Domain scores

0 to 100. Each domain is the mean of its scored features' percentiles against this asset class's reference basket; the working is tabled below.

fundamental
61.3
tokenomics
12.9
onchain
14.3
social
0.0

Cross-chain & resources

Present on 0 chain(s).
Links
🦎 CoinGecko

Data sources

What each source supplied for this token, with a link to its own page so every figure below can be checked at the source.

coingeckook
price, market cap, supply, volume, community up-votes, watchlists, repo links
defillamaok
fees, revenue, holders revenue, TVL, audit record (protocol, or chain for an L1)
santimentempty
daily active addresses (90-day trend, 30-day means) and dev-activity level (events/day over 90 days)
githubokdolomite-exchange
most recent push across the project's accounts (dead-token gate)
ethplorerok
top-10 holder shares (Ethereum ERC-20s only)
sourcifyok
contract source verification
cryptorankoff
vesting schedule / unlock overhang (Pro plan)
Key
ok: returned data for this token; it is in the score
empty: reachable, but has nothing on this token (not tracked there); scored without it
error: the request failed this run (rate limit or outage); scored without it and retried next refresh
off: not queried: no identifier for this token, or the source needs a key or plan we do not have
stale: the source failed this run; the last stored values were carried forward (dated in the advisory) so the score does not move on an outage

How the score is built

DeFi protocol. Each feature is computed from the raw figures shown, then ranked as a percentile (0 to 100) against the defi reference basket; features average within a domain; domains are weighted, with the weights renormalized over the domains that have data (a domain the class is defined by is floored, not skipped, when it has none); any gate that trips caps the result. Points are percentile times weight; they add up to the raw score.

FundamentalsValuation and cash flow: is it cheap relative to real economic activity?
weight 30%, 35% of what is present, 3/4 features, domain score 61.3
  • P/F
    lower is better, defillama
    pct 56 vs 25
    11.8% weight, +6.6
    Market cap: $15.70M
    Fees (total1y): $11.19M
    $15.70M ÷ $11.19M = 1.40x
  • P/S
    lower is better, defillama
    pct 64 vs 23
    11.8% weight, +7.5
    Market cap: $15.70M
    Revenue (total1y): $2.24M
    $15.70M ÷ $2.24M = 7.02x
  • MC / TVL
    lower is better, defillama
    pct 64 vs 26
    11.8% weight, +7.5
    Market cap: $15.70M
    TVL: $358.78M
    $15.70M ÷ $358.78M = 0.04x
  • Real yield
    higher is better, defillama
    not scored
    defillama responded but the ratio is undefined (zero denominator or no shared window)
TokenomicsSupply structure: dilution, unlocks, float, and value accrual to holders.
weight 25%, 29% of what is present, 2/5 features, domain score 12.9
  • FDV / MCAP
    lower is better, coingecko
    pct 13 vs 26
    14.7% weight, +1.9
    Total supply: 998.43M
    Circulating supply: 512.51M
    998.43M ÷ 512.51M = 1.95x
  • Unlock overhang
    lower is better, cryptorank
    not scored
    vesting data needs a CryptoRank Pro plan
  • Unlock / volume
    lower is better, cryptorank
    not scored
    next-unlock value needs CryptoRank Pro or DefiLlama Pro
  • Float
    higher is better, coingecko
    pct 13 vs 26
    14.7% weight, +1.9
    Circulating supply: 512.51M
    Total supply: 998.43M
    512.51M ÷ 998.43M = 51.3%
  • Token sink
    higher is better, defillama
    not scored
    defillama responded but the ratio is undefined (zero denominator or no shared window)
On-chainUsage and distribution: active-address growth and holder concentration.
weight 20%, 24% of what is present, 1/2 features, domain score 14.3
  • Top-10 holders
    lower is better, ethplorer
    pct 14 vs 19
    23.5% weight, +3.4
    Top-10 holder shares: (31.1% + 11.4% + 7.6% + 6.1% + 5.8% + 5.1% + 3.8% + 3.6% + 2.0% + 1.8%)
    Σ (31.1% + 11.4% + 7.6% + 6.1% + 5.8% + 5.1% + 3.8% + 3.6% + 2.0% + 1.8%) = 78.3%
  • Active-address growth
    higher is better, santiment
    not scored
    santiment has no data for this token
SocialAttention: is social interest rising ahead of price?
weight 10%, 12% of what is present, 1/3 features, domain score 0.0
  • Social trend
    higher is better, santiment
    not scored
    Santiment social volume needs DYOR_SANTIMENT_API_KEY
  • Sentiment
    higher is better, coingecko
    not scored
    coingecko responded but the ratio is undefined (zero denominator or no shared window)
  • Watchlists
    higher is better, coingecko
    pct 0 vs 26
    11.8% weight, +0.0
    CoinGecko watchlists: 5.50K
    5.50K = 5.50K
DevelopersBuilder activity: is the team still shipping, especially in a downturn?
weight 15%, 0/1 features, domain score n/a(no data, weight redistributed)
  • Dev activity
    higher is better, santiment
    not scored
    santiment has no data for this token
Composite
DomainWeightRenormalizedDomain scorePoints
Fundamentals(required)30%35.3%61.3+21.6
Tokenomics25%29.4%12.9+3.8
On-chain20%23.5%14.3+3.4
Social10%11.8%0.0+0.0
Developers15%n/ano datan/a
Raw score = Σ points28.8
Gate: hard disqualifiers

Each rule is checked against the figures shown; missing data never trips a rule. The strictest tripped rule sets the ceiling.

  • unverified_contractinactive
    Contract verified (Sourcify): yes, trips when False
    If tripped: zeroes the score
  • anonymous_teaminactive
    Team anonymous: n/a, trips when True
    If tripped: caps the score at 40
  • no_auditpass
    Audit on record (DefiLlama): yes, trips when False
    If tripped: caps the score at 50
  • extreme_fdv_mcappass
    FDV / MCAP: 1.95x, trips above 10x
    If tripped: caps the score at 40
  • dead_tokenpass
    Days since last GitHub push (dolomite-exchange): 0, trips at 180 days or more
    Santiment dev events in window: n/a, > 0 overrules a stale GitHub org
    24h volume: $3.99M, trips below $1,000
    If tripped: zeroes the score
No rule tripped, so the final score is the raw score: 28.8
Tier
A (high conviction) 80+B (qualified) 60+C (watchlist) 40+D (avoid) 0+
28.8 maps to D (avoid). 100% of plus or minus 20% weight perturbations keep this tier. Coverage 7/15 of this class's features (47%). medium confidence.

Peer comparison

pancakeswap-token
63.6
benqi
62.4
uniswap
60.2
stargate-finance
59.9
gmx
59.2
curve-dao-token
58.0
aave
57.2
sky
56.7
sushi
55.6
yearn-finance
55.2
rocket-pool
55.0
jito-governance-token
53.8

In one paragraph

Dolomite (DOLO), DeFi protocol: score 28.8/100, tier D (avoid), rank #56 of 67 same-class peers. Domains, 0 to 100, with each one's weight in this class's composite: fundamentals 61.3/100 (weight 30%), tokenomics 12.9/100 (weight 25%), on-chain 14.3/100 (weight 20%), social 0.0/100 (weight 10%), developers no data (its 15% weight redistributed). Data coverage 7/15 features (47%), confidence medium, 100% tier-stable. Gate flags: none. All figures are already on a 0 to 100 scale; do not rescale.

About this page

This is Dolomite's permanent DYOR page, scored from the board run of 2026-10-08 against 66 other DeFi protocol tokens. Scores are 0 to 100; the tier maps A at 80 or above, B at 60, C at 40, D below. Every figure above shows its raw inputs, formula, percentile and weight; see the methodology for how the classes, gates and weights work. For today's numbers, run a live analysis. Research aid, not financial advice.

Other DeFi protocol tokens on the board: pancakeswap-token (63.6/100), benqi (62.4/100), uniswap (60.2/100), stargate-finance (59.9/100), gmx (59.2/100), curve-dao-token (58/100), aave (57.2/100), sky (56.7/100). All scored tokens