Bonk
BONKMemecoin✓ verifiedbonk. Run a live analysisPrice
Domain scores
0 to 100. Each domain is the mean of its scored features' percentiles against this asset class's reference basket; the working is tabled below.
Data sources
What each source supplied for this token, with a link to its own page so every figure below can be checked at the source.
How the score is built
Memecoin. Each feature is computed from the raw figures shown, then ranked as a percentile (0 to 100) against the meme reference basket; features average within a domain; domains are weighted, with the weights renormalized over the domains that have data (a domain the class is defined by is floored, not skipped, when it has none); any gate that trips caps the result. Points are percentile times weight; they add up to the raw score.
- Floathigher is better, coingeckopct 62 vs 1420.0% weight, +12.3Circulating supply: 87994.37BTotal supply: 87994.37B87994.37B ÷ 87994.37B = 100.0%
- Unlock overhanglower is better, cryptoranknot scoredvesting data needs a CryptoRank Pro plan
- Top-10 holderslower is better, ethplorerpct 100 vs 817.5% weight, +17.5Top-10 holder shares: (8.3% + 3.7% + 2.1% + 1.6% + 1.6% + 1.2% + 1.2% + 1.1% + 1.0% + 1.0%)Σ (8.3% + 3.7% + 2.1% + 1.6% + 1.6% + 1.2% + 1.2% + 1.1% + 1.0% + 1.0%) = 22.8%
- Active-address growthhigher is better, santimentpct 69 vs 1217.5% weight, +12.0Daily active addresses, first 30-day mean: 14.61KDaily active addresses, last 30-day mean: 22.08Kwindow: 90(22.08K − 14.61K) ÷ 14.61K = 51.1%
- Social trendhigher is better, santimentnot scoredSantiment social volume needs DYOR_SANTIMENT_API_KEY
- Sentimenthigher is better, coingeckopct 83 vs 1322.5% weight, +18.8Community up-votes: 100.0%100.0% ÷ 100 = 100.0%
- Watchlistshigher is better, coingeckopct 77 vs 1422.5% weight, +17.3CoinGecko watchlists: 209.87K209.87K = 209.87K
| Domain | Weight | Renormalized | Domain score | Points |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Tokenomics | 20% | 20.0% | 61.5 | +12.3 |
| On-chain | 35% | 35.0% | 84.4 | +29.5 |
| Social | 45% | 45.0% | 80.1 | +36.1 |
| Raw score = Σ points | 77.9 | |||
Each rule is checked against the figures shown; missing data never trips a rule. The strictest tripped rule sets the ceiling.
- unverified_contractinactiveContract verified (Sourcify): yes, trips when FalseIf tripped: zeroes the score
- anonymous_teaminactiveTeam anonymous: n/a, trips when TrueIf tripped: caps the score at 40
- no_auditpassAudit on record (DefiLlama): n/a, trips when FalseIf tripped: caps the score at 50
- extreme_fdv_mcappassFDV / MCAP: 1.00x, trips above 10xIf tripped: caps the score at 40
- dead_tokenpassDays since last GitHub push: n/a, trips at 180 days or moreSantiment dev events in window: n/a, > 0 overrules a stale GitHub org24h volume: $36.99M, trips below $1,000If tripped: zeroes the score
Peer comparison
In one paragraph
Bonk (BONK), Memecoin: score 77.9/100, tier B (qualified), rank #1 of 15 same-class peers. Domains, 0 to 100, with each one's weight in this class's composite: tokenomics 61.5/100 (weight 20%), on-chain 84.4/100 (weight 35%), social 80.1/100 (weight 45%). Data coverage 5/7 features (71%), confidence high, 100% tier-stable. Gate flags: none. All figures are already on a 0 to 100 scale; do not rescale.
About this page
This is Bonk's permanent DYOR page, scored from the board run of 2026-10-08 against 14 other Memecoin tokens. Scores are 0 to 100; the tier maps A at 80 or above, B at 60, C at 40, D below. Every figure above shows its raw inputs, formula, percentile and weight; see the methodology for how the classes, gates and weights work. For today's numbers, run a live analysis. Research aid, not financial advice.