Fartcoin

FARTCOINMemecoin

scored from the board run of 2026-10-08. fartcoin. Run a live analysis

🏷️ Speculative; judged on distribution, liquidity, and social attention, not fundamentals.

62.5/100

B (qualified)

coverage 57%, medium confidence, 100% tier-stable, rank #5/15

Share:Post on X

Compare with other tokens

Price

$0.174

Market cap

$174.00M

FDV

$174.00M

24h volume

$27.52M

24h change

-1.1%

From ATH

-93%

Circulating

999.92M

Total supply

999.92M

Price

Domain scores

0 to 100. Each domain is the mean of its scored features' percentiles against this asset class's reference basket; the working is tabled below.

tokenomics

61.5

onchain

72.4

social

55.1

Cross-chain & resources

Present on 0 chain(s).

Links

🦎 CoinGecko

Data sources

What each source supplied for this token, with a link to its own page so every figure below can be checked at the source.

coingeckook

price, market cap, supply, volume, community up-votes, watchlists, repo links

defillamaoff

fees, revenue, holders revenue, TVL, audit record (protocol, or chain for an L1)

santimentok

daily active addresses (90-day trend, 30-day means) and dev-activity level (events/day over 90 days)

githuboff

most recent push across the project's accounts (dead-token gate)

ethploreroff

top-10 holder shares (Ethereum ERC-20s only)

sourcifyoff

contract source verification

cryptorankoff

vesting schedule / unlock overhang (Pro plan)

Key

ok: returned data for this token; it is in the score

empty: reachable, but has nothing on this token (not tracked there); scored without it

error: the request failed this run (rate limit or outage); scored without it and retried next refresh

off: not queried: no identifier for this token, or the source needs a key or plan we do not have

stale: the source failed this run; the last stored values were carried forward (dated in the advisory) so the score does not move on an outage

How the score is built

Memecoin. Each feature is computed from the raw figures shown, then ranked as a percentile (0 to 100) against the meme reference basket; features average within a domain; domains are weighted, with the weights renormalized over the domains that have data (a domain the class is defined by is floored, not skipped, when it has none); any gate that trips caps the result. Points are percentile times weight; they add up to the raw score.

TokenomicsSupply structure: dilution, unlocks, float, and value accrual to holders.

weight 20%, 1/2 features, domain score 61.5

Float
higher is better, coingecko
pct 62 vs 14
20.0% weight, +12.3
Circulating supply: 999.92M
Total supply: 999.92M
999.92M ÷ 999.92M = 100.0%
Unlock overhang
lower is better, cryptorank
not scored
vesting data needs a CryptoRank Pro plan

Feature	Raw figures	Calculation	Percentile	Weight	Points
Float higher is better, coingecko	Circulating supply: 999.92M Total supply: 999.92M	999.92M ÷ 999.92M = 100.0%	62 vs 14 peers	20.0%	+12.3
Unlock overhang lower is better, cryptorank	n/a	vesting data needs a CryptoRank Pro plan	n/a	n/a	n/a

On-chainUsage and distribution: active-address growth and holder concentration.

weight 35%, 1/2 features, domain score 72.4

Top-10 holders
lower is better, ethplorer
not scored
ethplorer feed off: no identifier for this token
Active-address growth
higher is better, santiment
pct 72 vs 12
35.0% weight, +25.3
Daily active addresses, first 30-day mean: 10.56K
Daily active addresses, last 30-day mean: 16.34K
window: 90
(16.34K − 10.56K) ÷ 10.56K = 54.7%

Feature	Raw figures	Calculation	Percentile	Weight	Points
Top-10 holders lower is better, ethplorer	n/a	ethplorer feed off: no identifier for this token	n/a	n/a	n/a
Active-address growth higher is better, santiment	Daily active addresses, first 30-day mean: 10.56K Daily active addresses, last 30-day mean: 16.34K window: 90	(16.34K − 10.56K) ÷ 10.56K = 54.7%	72 vs 12 peers	35.0%	+25.3

SocialAttention: is social interest rising ahead of price?

weight 45%, 2/3 features, domain score 55.1

Social trend
higher is better, santiment
not scored
Santiment social volume needs DYOR_SANTIMENT_API_KEY
Sentiment
higher is better, coingecko
pct 83 vs 13
22.5% weight, +18.8
Community up-votes: 100.0%
100.0% ÷ 100 = 100.0%
Watchlists
higher is better, coingecko
pct 27 vs 14
22.5% weight, +6.1
CoinGecko watchlists: 56.91K
56.91K = 56.91K

Feature	Raw figures	Calculation	Percentile	Weight	Points
Social trend higher is better, santiment	n/a	Santiment social volume needs DYOR_SANTIMENT_API_KEY	n/a	n/a	n/a
Sentiment higher is better, coingecko	Community up-votes: 100.0%	100.0% ÷ 100 = 100.0%	83 vs 13 peers	22.5%	+18.8
Watchlists higher is better, coingecko	CoinGecko watchlists: 56.91K	56.91K = 56.91K	27 vs 14 peers	22.5%	+6.1

Composite

Domain	Weight	Renormalized	Domain score	Points
Tokenomics	20%	20.0%	61.5	+12.3
On-chain	35%	35.0%	72.4	+25.3
Social	45%	45.0%	55.1	+24.8
Raw score = Σ points				62.5

Gate: hard disqualifiers

Each rule is checked against the figures shown; missing data never trips a rule. The strictest tripped rule sets the ceiling.

unverified_contractinactive
Contract verified (Sourcify): n/a, trips when False
If tripped: zeroes the score
anonymous_teaminactive
Team anonymous: n/a, trips when True
If tripped: caps the score at 40
no_auditpass
Audit on record (DefiLlama): n/a, trips when False
If tripped: caps the score at 50
extreme_fdv_mcappass
FDV / MCAP: 1.00x, trips above 10x
If tripped: caps the score at 40
dead_tokenpass
Days since last GitHub push: n/a, trips at 180 days or more
Santiment dev events in window: n/a, > 0 overrules a stale GitHub org
24h volume: $27.52M, trips below $1,000
If tripped: zeroes the score

No rule tripped, so the final score is the raw score: 62.5

Rule	Evidence	If tripped	Result
unverified_contract	Contract verified (Sourcify): n/a, trips when False	zeroes the score	inactive
anonymous_team	Team anonymous: n/a, trips when True	caps the score at 40	inactive
no_audit	Audit on record (DefiLlama): n/a, trips when False	caps the score at 50	pass
extreme_fdv_mcap	FDV / MCAP: 1.00x, trips above 10x	caps the score at 40	pass
dead_token	Days since last GitHub push: n/a, trips at 180 days or more Santiment dev events in window: n/a, > 0 overrules a stale GitHub org 24h volume: $27.52M, trips below $1,000	zeroes the score	pass
No rule tripped, so the final score is the raw score			62.5

Tier

A (high conviction) 80+B (qualified) 60+C (watchlist) 40+D (avoid) 0+

62.5 maps to B (qualified). 100% of plus or minus 20% weight perturbations keep this tier. Coverage 4/7 of this class's features (57%). medium confidence.

Peer comparison

bonk

77.9

B (qualified)

dogwifcoin

73.3

B (qualified)

pepe

66.8

B (qualified)

spx6900

63.9

B (qualified)

⭐ fartcoin

62.5

B (qualified)

turbo

61.0

B (qualified)

popcat

52.6

C (watchlist)

pump-fun

51.7

C (watchlist)

dogecoin

51.0

C (watchlist)

mog-coin

50.6

C (watchlist)

pudgy-penguins

48.4

C (watchlist)

official-trump

47.2

C (watchlist)

In one paragraph

Fartcoin (FARTCOIN), Memecoin: score 62.5/100, tier B (qualified), rank #5 of 15 same-class peers. Domains, 0 to 100, with each one's weight in this class's composite: tokenomics 61.5/100 (weight 20%), on-chain 72.4/100 (weight 35%), social 55.1/100 (weight 45%). Data coverage 4/7 features (57%), confidence medium, 100% tier-stable. Gate flags: none. All figures are already on a 0 to 100 scale; do not rescale.

About this page

This is Fartcoin's permanent DYOR page, scored from the board run of 2026-10-08 against 14 other Memecoin tokens. Scores are 0 to 100; the tier maps A at 80 or above, B at 60, C at 40, D below. Every figure above shows its raw inputs, formula, percentile and weight; see the methodology for how the classes, gates and weights work. For today's numbers, run a live analysis. Research aid, not financial advice.

Other Memecoin tokens on the board: bonk (77.9/100), dogwifcoin (73.3/100), pepe (66.8/100), spx6900 (63.9/100), turbo (61/100), popcat (52.6/100), pump-fun (51.7/100), dogecoin (51/100). All scored tokens