🧭DYORCryptoOpsec

Bitcoin

BTCMonetary / store-of-value
scored from the board run of 2026-10-08. bitcoin. Run a live analysis
🏷️ No protocol revenue expected; judged on scarcity, decentralized accumulation, and adoption.
57.6/100
C (watchlist)
coverage 67%, high confidence, 100% tier-stable, rank #5/12
Share:Post on X
Compare with other tokens
Price
$85,244
Market cap
$1712.81B
FDV
$1712.82B
24h volume
$15.02B
24h change
+0.7%
From ATH
-32%
Circulating
20.09M
Total supply
20.09M

Price

Loading...

Domain scores

0 to 100. Each domain is the mean of its scored features' percentiles against this asset class's reference basket; the working is tabled below.

tokenomics
54.2
onchain
47.6
social
57.9
dev
83.6

Cross-chain & resources

Present on 0 chain(s).
Links
🦎 CoinGecko

Data sources

What each source supplied for this token, with a link to its own page so every figure below can be checked at the source.

coingeckook
price, market cap, supply, volume, community up-votes, watchlists, repo links
defillamaok
fees, revenue, holders revenue, TVL, audit record (protocol, or chain for an L1)
santimentok
daily active addresses (90-day trend, 30-day means) and dev-activity level (events/day over 90 days)
githubokbitcoin
most recent push across the project's accounts (dead-token gate)
ethploreroff
top-10 holder shares (Ethereum ERC-20s only)
sourcifyoff
contract source verification
cryptorankoff
vesting schedule / unlock overhang (Pro plan)
Key
ok: returned data for this token; it is in the score
empty: reachable, but has nothing on this token (not tracked there); scored without it
error: the request failed this run (rate limit or outage); scored without it and retried next refresh
off: not queried: no identifier for this token, or the source needs a key or plan we do not have
stale: the source failed this run; the last stored values were carried forward (dated in the advisory) so the score does not move on an outage

How the score is built

Monetary / store-of-value. Each feature is computed from the raw figures shown, then ranked as a percentile (0 to 100) against the monetary reference basket; features average within a domain; domains are weighted, with the weights renormalized over the domains that have data (a domain the class is defined by is floored, not skipped, when it has none); any gate that trips caps the result. Points are percentile times weight; they add up to the raw score.

TokenomicsSupply structure: dilution, unlocks, float, and value accrual to holders.
weight 35%, 2/3 features, domain score 54.2
  • Float
    higher is better, coingecko
    pct 54 vs 13
    17.5% weight, +9.5
    Circulating supply: 20.09M
    Total supply: 20.09M
    20.09M ÷ 20.09M = 100.0%
  • FDV / MCAP
    lower is better, coingecko
    pct 54 vs 13
    17.5% weight, +9.5
    Total supply: 20.09M
    Circulating supply: 20.09M
    20.09M ÷ 20.09M = 1.00x
  • Unlock overhang
    lower is better, cryptorank
    not scored
    vesting data needs a CryptoRank Pro plan
On-chainUsage and distribution: active-address growth and holder concentration.
weight 35%, 1/2 features, domain score 47.6
  • Top-10 holders
    lower is better, ethplorer
    not scored
    ethplorer feed off: no identifier for this token
  • Active-address growth
    higher is better, santiment
    pct 48 vs 4
    35.0% weight, +16.6
    Daily active addresses, first 30-day mean: 638.49K
    Daily active addresses, last 30-day mean: 638.46K
    window: 90
    (638.46K − 638.49K) ÷ 638.49K = -0.0%
SocialAttention: is social interest rising ahead of price?
weight 12%, 2/3 features, domain score 57.9
  • Social trend
    higher is better, santiment
    not scored
    Santiment social volume needs DYOR_SANTIMENT_API_KEY
  • Sentiment
    higher is better, coingecko
    pct 16 vs 13
    6.0% weight, +1.0
    Community up-votes: 74.5%
    74.5% ÷ 100 = 74.5%
  • Watchlists
    higher is better, coingecko
    pct 100 vs 13
    6.0% weight, +6.0
    CoinGecko watchlists: 2.46M
    2.46M = 2.46M
DevelopersBuilder activity: is the team still shipping, especially in a downturn?
weight 18%, 1/1 features, domain score 83.6
  • Dev activity
    higher is better, santiment
    pct 84 vs 13
    18.0% weight, +15.1
    Dev-activity events in window: 13.49K
    days with data: 90
    13.49K ÷ 90 = 149.9/day
Composite
DomainWeightRenormalizedDomain scorePoints
Tokenomics35%35.0%54.2+19.0
On-chain35%35.0%47.6+16.6
Social12%12.0%57.9+7.0
Developers18%18.0%83.6+15.1
Raw score = Σ points57.6
Gate: hard disqualifiers

Each rule is checked against the figures shown; missing data never trips a rule. The strictest tripped rule sets the ceiling.

  • unverified_contractinactive
    Contract verified (Sourcify): n/a, trips when False
    If tripped: zeroes the score
  • anonymous_teaminactive
    Team anonymous: n/a, trips when True
    If tripped: caps the score at 40
  • no_auditpass
    Audit on record (DefiLlama): n/a, trips when False
    If tripped: caps the score at 50
  • extreme_fdv_mcappass
    FDV / MCAP: 1.00x, trips above 10x
    If tripped: caps the score at 40
  • dead_tokenpass
    Days since last GitHub push (bitcoin): 1, trips at 180 days or more
    Santiment dev events in window: 13.49K, > 0 overrules a stale GitHub org
    24h volume: $15.02B, trips below $1,000
    If tripped: zeroes the score
No rule tripped, so the final score is the raw score: 57.6
Tier
A (high conviction) 80+B (qualified) 60+C (watchlist) 40+D (avoid) 0+
57.6 maps to C (watchlist). 100% of plus or minus 20% weight perturbations keep this tier. Coverage 6/9 of this class's features (67%). high confidence.

Peer comparison

bitcoin-cash
65.5
dash
62.7
zcash
61.2
monero
60.2
⭐ bitcoin
57.6
decred
54.6
ecash
48.4
ravencoin
44.6
bitcoin-cash-sv
41.9
litecoin
39.0
digibyte
38.6
zencash
19.2

In one paragraph

Bitcoin (BTC), Monetary / store-of-value: score 57.6/100, tier C (watchlist), rank #5 of 12 same-class peers. Domains, 0 to 100, with each one's weight in this class's composite: tokenomics 54.2/100 (weight 35%), on-chain 47.6/100 (weight 35%), social 57.9/100 (weight 12%), developers 83.6/100 (weight 18%). Data coverage 6/9 features (67%), confidence high, 100% tier-stable. Gate flags: none. All figures are already on a 0 to 100 scale; do not rescale.

About this page

This is Bitcoin's permanent DYOR page, scored from the board run of 2026-10-08 against 11 other Monetary / store-of-value tokens. Scores are 0 to 100; the tier maps A at 80 or above, B at 60, C at 40, D below. Every figure above shows its raw inputs, formula, percentile and weight; see the methodology for how the classes, gates and weights work. For today's numbers, run a live analysis. Research aid, not financial advice.

Other Monetary / store-of-value tokens on the board: bitcoin-cash (65.5/100), dash (62.7/100), zcash (61.2/100), monero (60.2/100), decred (54.6/100), ecash (48.4/100), ravencoin (44.6/100), bitcoin-cash-sv (41.9/100). All scored tokens