Bitcoin Cash

BCHMonetary / store-of-value

scored from the board run of 2026-10-08. bitcoin-cash. Run a live analysis

🏷️ No protocol revenue expected; judged on scarcity, decentralized accumulation, and adoption.

65.5/100

B (qualified)

coverage 67%, high confidence, 100% tier-stable, rank #1/12

Share:Post on X

Compare with other tokens

Price

$317.55

Market cap

$6.38B

FDV

$6.38B

24h volume

$143.03M

24h change

+1.7%

From ATH

-92%

Circulating

20.10M

Total supply

20.10M

Price

Domain scores

0 to 100. Each domain is the mean of its scored features' percentiles against this asset class's reference basket; the working is tabled below.

tokenomics

54.2

onchain

98.1

social

77.1

dev

16.7

Cross-chain & resources

Present on 0 chain(s).

Links

🦎 CoinGecko

Data sources

What each source supplied for this token, with a link to its own page so every figure below can be checked at the source.

coingeckook

price, market cap, supply, volume, community up-votes, watchlists, repo links

defillamaok

fees, revenue, holders revenue, TVL, audit record (protocol, or chain for an L1)

santimentok

daily active addresses (90-day trend, 30-day means) and dev-activity level (events/day over 90 days)

githubokbitcoin-cash-node

most recent push across the project's accounts (dead-token gate)

ethploreroff

top-10 holder shares (Ethereum ERC-20s only)

sourcifyoff

contract source verification

cryptorankoff

vesting schedule / unlock overhang (Pro plan)

Key

ok: returned data for this token; it is in the score

empty: reachable, but has nothing on this token (not tracked there); scored without it

error: the request failed this run (rate limit or outage); scored without it and retried next refresh

off: not queried: no identifier for this token, or the source needs a key or plan we do not have

stale: the source failed this run; the last stored values were carried forward (dated in the advisory) so the score does not move on an outage

How the score is built

Monetary / store-of-value. Each feature is computed from the raw figures shown, then ranked as a percentile (0 to 100) against the monetary reference basket; features average within a domain; domains are weighted, with the weights renormalized over the domains that have data (a domain the class is defined by is floored, not skipped, when it has none); any gate that trips caps the result. Points are percentile times weight; they add up to the raw score.

TokenomicsSupply structure: dilution, unlocks, float, and value accrual to holders.

weight 35%, 2/3 features, domain score 54.2

Float
higher is better, coingecko
pct 54 vs 13
17.5% weight, +9.5
Circulating supply: 20.10M
Total supply: 20.10M
20.10M ÷ 20.10M = 100.0%
FDV / MCAP
lower is better, coingecko
pct 54 vs 13
17.5% weight, +9.5
Total supply: 20.10M
Circulating supply: 20.10M
20.10M ÷ 20.10M = 1.00x
Unlock overhang
lower is better, cryptorank
not scored
vesting data needs a CryptoRank Pro plan

Feature	Raw figures	Calculation	Percentile	Weight	Points
Float higher is better, coingecko	Circulating supply: 20.10M Total supply: 20.10M	20.10M ÷ 20.10M = 100.0%	54 vs 13 peers	17.5%	+9.5
FDV / MCAP lower is better, coingecko	Total supply: 20.10M Circulating supply: 20.10M	20.10M ÷ 20.10M = 1.00x	54 vs 13 peers	17.5%	+9.5
Unlock overhang lower is better, cryptorank	n/a	vesting data needs a CryptoRank Pro plan	n/a	n/a	n/a

On-chainUsage and distribution: active-address growth and holder concentration.

weight 35%, 1/2 features, domain score 98.1

Top-10 holders
lower is better, ethplorer
not scored
ethplorer feed off: no identifier for this token
Active-address growth
higher is better, santiment
pct 98 vs 4
35.0% weight, +34.3
Daily active addresses, first 30-day mean: 20.30K
Daily active addresses, last 30-day mean: 25.40K
window: 90
(25.40K − 20.30K) ÷ 20.30K = 25.1%

Feature	Raw figures	Calculation	Percentile	Weight	Points
Top-10 holders lower is better, ethplorer	n/a	ethplorer feed off: no identifier for this token	n/a	n/a	n/a
Active-address growth higher is better, santiment	Daily active addresses, first 30-day mean: 20.30K Daily active addresses, last 30-day mean: 25.40K window: 90	(25.40K − 20.30K) ÷ 20.30K = 25.1%	98 vs 4 peers	35.0%	+34.3

SocialAttention: is social interest rising ahead of price?

weight 12%, 2/3 features, domain score 77.1

Social trend
higher is better, santiment
not scored
Santiment social volume needs DYOR_SANTIMENT_API_KEY
Sentiment
higher is better, coingecko
pct 79 vs 13
6.0% weight, +4.7
Community up-votes: 100.0%
100.0% ÷ 100 = 100.0%
Watchlists
higher is better, coingecko
pct 75 vs 13
6.0% weight, +4.5
CoinGecko watchlists: 199.99K
199.99K = 199.99K

Feature	Raw figures	Calculation	Percentile	Weight	Points
Social trend higher is better, santiment	n/a	Santiment social volume needs DYOR_SANTIMENT_API_KEY	n/a	n/a	n/a
Sentiment higher is better, coingecko	Community up-votes: 100.0%	100.0% ÷ 100 = 100.0%	79 vs 13 peers	6.0%	+4.7
Watchlists higher is better, coingecko	CoinGecko watchlists: 199.99K	199.99K = 199.99K	75 vs 13 peers	6.0%	+4.5

DevelopersBuilder activity: is the team still shipping, especially in a downturn?

weight 18%, 1/1 features, domain score 16.7

Dev activity
higher is better, santiment
pct 17 vs 13
18.0% weight, +3.0
Dev-activity events in window: 0
days with data: 90
0 ÷ 90 = 0.0/day

Feature	Raw figures	Calculation	Percentile	Weight	Points
Dev activity higher is better, santiment	Dev-activity events in window: 0 days with data: 90	0 ÷ 90 = 0.0/day	17 vs 13 peers	18.0%	+3.0

Composite

Domain	Weight	Renormalized	Domain score	Points
Tokenomics	35%	35.0%	54.2	+19.0
On-chain	35%	35.0%	98.1	+34.3
Social	12%	12.0%	77.1	+9.2
Developers	18%	18.0%	16.7	+3.0
Raw score = Σ points				65.5

Gate: hard disqualifiers

Each rule is checked against the figures shown; missing data never trips a rule. The strictest tripped rule sets the ceiling.

unverified_contractinactive
Contract verified (Sourcify): n/a, trips when False
If tripped: zeroes the score
anonymous_teaminactive
Team anonymous: n/a, trips when True
If tripped: caps the score at 40
no_auditpass
Audit on record (DefiLlama): n/a, trips when False
If tripped: caps the score at 50
extreme_fdv_mcappass
FDV / MCAP: 1.00x, trips above 10x
If tripped: caps the score at 40
dead_tokenpass
Days since last GitHub push (bitcoin-cash-node): 2, trips at 180 days or more
Santiment dev events in window: 0, > 0 overrules a stale GitHub org
24h volume: $143.03M, trips below $1,000
If tripped: zeroes the score

No rule tripped, so the final score is the raw score: 65.5

Rule	Evidence	If tripped	Result
unverified_contract	Contract verified (Sourcify): n/a, trips when False	zeroes the score	inactive
anonymous_team	Team anonymous: n/a, trips when True	caps the score at 40	inactive
no_audit	Audit on record (DefiLlama): n/a, trips when False	caps the score at 50	pass
extreme_fdv_mcap	FDV / MCAP: 1.00x, trips above 10x	caps the score at 40	pass
dead_token	Days since last GitHub push (bitcoin-cash-node): 2, trips at 180 days or more Santiment dev events in window: 0, > 0 overrules a stale GitHub org 24h volume: $143.03M, trips below $1,000	zeroes the score	pass
No rule tripped, so the final score is the raw score			65.5

Tier

A (high conviction) 80+B (qualified) 60+C (watchlist) 40+D (avoid) 0+

65.5 maps to B (qualified). 100% of plus or minus 20% weight perturbations keep this tier. Coverage 6/9 of this class's features (67%). high confidence.

Peer comparison

⭐ bitcoin-cash

65.5

B (qualified)

dash

62.7

B (qualified)

zcash

61.2

B (qualified)

monero

60.2

B (qualified)

bitcoin

57.6

C (watchlist)

decred

54.6

C (watchlist)

ecash

48.4

C (watchlist)

ravencoin

44.6

C (watchlist)

bitcoin-cash-sv

41.9

C (watchlist)

litecoin

39.0

D (avoid)

digibyte

38.6

D (avoid)

zencash

19.2

D (avoid)

In one paragraph

Bitcoin Cash (BCH), Monetary / store-of-value: score 65.5/100, tier B (qualified), rank #1 of 12 same-class peers. Domains, 0 to 100, with each one's weight in this class's composite: tokenomics 54.2/100 (weight 35%), on-chain 98.1/100 (weight 35%), social 77.1/100 (weight 12%), developers 16.7/100 (weight 18%). Data coverage 6/9 features (67%), confidence high, 100% tier-stable. Gate flags: none. All figures are already on a 0 to 100 scale; do not rescale.

About this page

This is Bitcoin Cash's permanent DYOR page, scored from the board run of 2026-10-08 against 11 other Monetary / store-of-value tokens. Scores are 0 to 100; the tier maps A at 80 or above, B at 60, C at 40, D below. Every figure above shows its raw inputs, formula, percentile and weight; see the methodology for how the classes, gates and weights work. For today's numbers, run a live analysis. Research aid, not financial advice.

Other Monetary / store-of-value tokens on the board: dash (62.7/100), zcash (61.2/100), monero (60.2/100), bitcoin (57.6/100), decred (54.6/100), ecash (48.4/100), ravencoin (44.6/100), bitcoin-cash-sv (41.9/100). All scored tokens