eCash

XECMonetary / store-of-value

scored from the board run of 2026-10-08. ecash. Run a live analysis

🏷️ No protocol revenue expected; judged on scarcity, decentralized accumulation, and adoption.

48.4/100

C (watchlist)

coverage 56%, medium confidence, 100% tier-stable, rank #7/12

Share:Post on X

Compare with other tokens

Price

$0.00000804

Market cap

$161.56M

FDV

$161.56M

24h volume

$2.78M

24h change

+0.6%

From ATH

-98%

Circulating

20092.15B

Total supply

20092.22B

Price

Domain scores

0 to 100. Each domain is the mean of its scored features' percentiles against this asset class's reference basket; the working is tabled below.

tokenomics

54.2

social

29.2

dev

50.0

Cross-chain & resources

Present on 0 chain(s).

Links

🦎 CoinGecko

Data sources

What each source supplied for this token, with a link to its own page so every figure below can be checked at the source.

coingeckook

price, market cap, supply, volume, community up-votes, watchlists, repo links

defillamaoff

fees, revenue, holders revenue, TVL, audit record (protocol, or chain for an L1)

santimentempty

daily active addresses (90-day trend, 30-day means) and dev-activity level (events/day over 90 days)

githubokbitcoin-abc

most recent push across the project's accounts (dead-token gate)

ethploreroff

top-10 holder shares (Ethereum ERC-20s only)

sourcifyoff

contract source verification

cryptorankoff

vesting schedule / unlock overhang (Pro plan)

Key

ok: returned data for this token; it is in the score

empty: reachable, but has nothing on this token (not tracked there); scored without it

error: the request failed this run (rate limit or outage); scored without it and retried next refresh

off: not queried: no identifier for this token, or the source needs a key or plan we do not have

stale: the source failed this run; the last stored values were carried forward (dated in the advisory) so the score does not move on an outage

How the score is built

Monetary / store-of-value. Each feature is computed from the raw figures shown, then ranked as a percentile (0 to 100) against the monetary reference basket; features average within a domain; domains are weighted, with the weights renormalized over the domains that have data (a domain the class is defined by is floored, not skipped, when it has none); any gate that trips caps the result. Points are percentile times weight; they add up to the raw score.

TokenomicsSupply structure: dilution, unlocks, float, and value accrual to holders.

weight 35%, 54% of what is present, 2/3 features, domain score 54.2

Float
higher is better, coingecko
pct 54 vs 13
26.9% weight, +14.6
Circulating supply: 20092.15B
Total supply: 20092.22B
20092.15B ÷ 20092.22B = 100.0%
FDV / MCAP
lower is better, coingecko
pct 54 vs 13
26.9% weight, +14.6
Total supply: 20092.22B
Circulating supply: 20092.15B
20092.22B ÷ 20092.15B = 1.00x
Unlock overhang
lower is better, cryptorank
not scored
vesting data needs a CryptoRank Pro plan

Feature	Raw figures	Calculation	Percentile	Weight	Points
Float higher is better, coingecko	Circulating supply: 20092.15B Total supply: 20092.22B	20092.15B ÷ 20092.22B = 100.0%	54 vs 13 peers	26.9%	+14.6
FDV / MCAP lower is better, coingecko	Total supply: 20092.22B Circulating supply: 20092.15B	20092.22B ÷ 20092.15B = 1.00x	54 vs 13 peers	26.9%	+14.6
Unlock overhang lower is better, cryptorank	n/a	vesting data needs a CryptoRank Pro plan	n/a	n/a	n/a

On-chainUsage and distribution: active-address growth and holder concentration.

weight 35%, 0/2 features, domain score n/a(no data, weight redistributed)

Top-10 holders
lower is better, ethplorer
not scored
ethplorer feed off: no identifier for this token
Active-address growth
higher is better, santiment
not scored
santiment has no data for this token

Feature	Raw figures	Calculation	Percentile	Weight	Points
Top-10 holders lower is better, ethplorer	n/a	ethplorer feed off: no identifier for this token	n/a	n/a	n/a
Active-address growth higher is better, santiment	n/a	santiment has no data for this token	n/a	n/a	n/a

SocialAttention: is social interest rising ahead of price?

weight 12%, 18% of what is present, 2/3 features, domain score 29.2

Social trend
higher is better, santiment
not scored
Santiment social volume needs DYOR_SANTIMENT_API_KEY
Sentiment
higher is better, coingecko
pct 33 vs 13
9.2% weight, +3.1
Community up-votes: 80.0%
80.0% ÷ 100 = 80.0%
Watchlists
higher is better, coingecko
pct 25 vs 13
9.2% weight, +2.3
CoinGecko watchlists: 57.29K
57.29K = 57.29K

Feature	Raw figures	Calculation	Percentile	Weight	Points
Social trend higher is better, santiment	n/a	Santiment social volume needs DYOR_SANTIMENT_API_KEY	n/a	n/a	n/a
Sentiment higher is better, coingecko	Community up-votes: 80.0%	80.0% ÷ 100 = 80.0%	33 vs 13 peers	9.2%	+3.1
Watchlists higher is better, coingecko	CoinGecko watchlists: 57.29K	57.29K = 57.29K	25 vs 13 peers	9.2%	+2.3

DevelopersBuilder activity: is the team still shipping, especially in a downturn?

weight 18%, 28% of what is present, 1/1 features, domain score 50.0

Dev activity
higher is better, santiment
pct 50 vs 13
27.7% weight, +13.8
Dev-activity events in window: 302
days with data: 90
302 ÷ 90 = 3.4/day

Feature	Raw figures	Calculation	Percentile	Weight	Points
Dev activity higher is better, santiment	Dev-activity events in window: 302 days with data: 90	302 ÷ 90 = 3.4/day	50 vs 13 peers	27.7%	+13.8

Composite

Domain	Weight	Renormalized	Domain score	Points
Tokenomics	35%	53.8%	54.2	+29.2
On-chain	35%	n/a	no data	n/a
Social	12%	18.5%	29.2	+5.4
Developers	18%	27.7%	50.0	+13.8
Raw score = Σ points				48.4

Gate: hard disqualifiers

Each rule is checked against the figures shown; missing data never trips a rule. The strictest tripped rule sets the ceiling.

unverified_contractinactive
Contract verified (Sourcify): n/a, trips when False
If tripped: zeroes the score
anonymous_teaminactive
Team anonymous: n/a, trips when True
If tripped: caps the score at 40
no_auditpass
Audit on record (DefiLlama): n/a, trips when False
If tripped: caps the score at 50
extreme_fdv_mcappass
FDV / MCAP: 1.00x, trips above 10x
If tripped: caps the score at 40
dead_tokenpass
Days since last GitHub push (bitcoin-abc): 1, trips at 180 days or more
Santiment dev events in window: 302, > 0 overrules a stale GitHub org
24h volume: $2.78M, trips below $1,000
If tripped: zeroes the score

No rule tripped, so the final score is the raw score: 48.4

Rule	Evidence	If tripped	Result
unverified_contract	Contract verified (Sourcify): n/a, trips when False	zeroes the score	inactive
anonymous_team	Team anonymous: n/a, trips when True	caps the score at 40	inactive
no_audit	Audit on record (DefiLlama): n/a, trips when False	caps the score at 50	pass
extreme_fdv_mcap	FDV / MCAP: 1.00x, trips above 10x	caps the score at 40	pass
dead_token	Days since last GitHub push (bitcoin-abc): 1, trips at 180 days or more Santiment dev events in window: 302, > 0 overrules a stale GitHub org 24h volume: $2.78M, trips below $1,000	zeroes the score	pass
No rule tripped, so the final score is the raw score			48.4

Tier

A (high conviction) 80+B (qualified) 60+C (watchlist) 40+D (avoid) 0+

48.4 maps to C (watchlist). 100% of plus or minus 20% weight perturbations keep this tier. Coverage 5/9 of this class's features (56%). medium confidence.

Peer comparison

bitcoin-cash

65.5

B (qualified)

dash

62.7

B (qualified)

zcash

61.2

B (qualified)

monero

60.2

B (qualified)

bitcoin

57.6

C (watchlist)

decred

54.6

C (watchlist)

⭐ ecash

48.4

C (watchlist)

ravencoin

44.6

C (watchlist)

bitcoin-cash-sv

41.9

C (watchlist)

litecoin

39.0

D (avoid)

digibyte

38.6

D (avoid)

zencash

19.2

D (avoid)

In one paragraph

eCash (XEC), Monetary / store-of-value: score 48.4/100, tier C (watchlist), rank #7 of 12 same-class peers. Domains, 0 to 100, with each one's weight in this class's composite: tokenomics 54.2/100 (weight 35%), on-chain no data (its 35% weight redistributed), social 29.2/100 (weight 12%), developers 50.0/100 (weight 18%). Data coverage 5/9 features (56%), confidence medium, 100% tier-stable. Gate flags: none. All figures are already on a 0 to 100 scale; do not rescale.

About this page

This is eCash's permanent DYOR page, scored from the board run of 2026-10-08 against 11 other Monetary / store-of-value tokens. Scores are 0 to 100; the tier maps A at 80 or above, B at 60, C at 40, D below. Every figure above shows its raw inputs, formula, percentile and weight; see the methodology for how the classes, gates and weights work. For today's numbers, run a live analysis. Research aid, not financial advice.

Other Monetary / store-of-value tokens on the board: bitcoin-cash (65.5/100), dash (62.7/100), zcash (61.2/100), monero (60.2/100), bitcoin (57.6/100), decred (54.6/100), ravencoin (44.6/100), bitcoin-cash-sv (41.9/100). All scored tokens