Cosmos Hub

ATOML1 / platform✓ verified

scored from the board run of 2026-10-08. cosmos. Run a live analysis

🏷️ Smart-contract platform: ecosystem TVL, adoption, and dev activity lead.

40.1/100

C (watchlist)

coverage 57%, medium confidence, 60% tier-stable, rank #12/15

Share:Post on X

Compare with other tokens

Price

$1.7

Market cap

$910.97M

FDV

$910.98M

24h volume

$35.77M

24h change

+2.0%

From ATH

-96%

Circulating

534.08M

Total supply

534.10M

Price

Domain scores

0 to 100. Each domain is the mean of its scored features' percentiles against this asset class's reference basket; the working is tabled below.

fundamental

19.7

tokenomics

78.6

social

45.4

dev

21.6

Cross-chain & resources

Present on 0 chain(s).

Links

🦎 CoinGecko

Data sources

What each source supplied for this token, with a link to its own page so every figure below can be checked at the source.

coingeckook

price, market cap, supply, volume, community up-votes, watchlists, repo links

defillamaok

fees, revenue, holders revenue, TVL, audit record (protocol, or chain for an L1)

santimentempty

daily active addresses (90-day trend, 30-day means) and dev-activity level (events/day over 90 days)

githubokcosmos

most recent push across the project's accounts (dead-token gate)

ethploreroff

top-10 holder shares (Ethereum ERC-20s only)

sourcifyok

contract source verification

cryptorankoff

vesting schedule / unlock overhang (Pro plan)

Key

ok: returned data for this token; it is in the score

empty: reachable, but has nothing on this token (not tracked there); scored without it

error: the request failed this run (rate limit or outage); scored without it and retried next refresh

off: not queried: no identifier for this token, or the source needs a key or plan we do not have

stale: the source failed this run; the last stored values were carried forward (dated in the advisory) so the score does not move on an outage

How the score is built

L1 / platform. Each feature is computed from the raw figures shown, then ranked as a percentile (0 to 100) against the l1 reference basket; features average within a domain; domains are weighted, with the weights renormalized over the domains that have data (a domain the class is defined by is floored, not skipped, when it has none); any gate that trips caps the result. Points are percentile times weight; they add up to the raw score.

FundamentalsValuation and cash flow: is it cheap relative to real economic activity?

weight 18%, 24% of what is present, 3/4 features, domain score 19.7

MC / TVL
lower is better, defillama
pct 0 vs 13
8.0% weight, +0.0
Market cap: $910.97M
TVL: $144.28K
$910.97M ÷ $144.28K = 6314x
P/F
lower is better, defillama
pct 31 vs 14
8.0% weight, +2.5
Market cap: $910.97M
Fees (total1y): $4.56M
$910.97M ÷ $4.56M = 200x
P/S
lower is better, defillama
pct 28 vs 13
8.0% weight, +2.3
Market cap: $910.97M
Revenue (total1y): $1.29M
$910.97M ÷ $1.29M = 709x
Real yield
higher is better, defillama
not scored
defillama responded but the ratio is undefined (zero denominator or no shared window)

Feature	Raw figures	Calculation	Percentile	Weight	Points
MC / TVL lower is better, defillama	Market cap: $910.97M TVL: $144.28K	$910.97M ÷ $144.28K = 6314x	0 vs 13 peers	8.0%	+0.0
P/F lower is better, defillama	Market cap: $910.97M Fees (total1y): $4.56M	$910.97M ÷ $4.56M = 200x	31 vs 14 peers	8.0%	+2.5
P/S lower is better, defillama	Market cap: $910.97M Revenue (total1y): $1.29M	$910.97M ÷ $1.29M = 709x	28 vs 13 peers	8.0%	+2.3
Real yield higher is better, defillama	n/a	defillama responded but the ratio is undefined (zero denominator or no shared window)	n/a	n/a	n/a

TokenomicsSupply structure: dilution, unlocks, float, and value accrual to holders.

weight 20%, 27% of what is present, 2/4 features, domain score 78.6

FDV / MCAP
lower is better, coingecko
pct 79 vs 15
13.3% weight, +10.5
Total supply: 534.10M
Circulating supply: 534.08M
534.10M ÷ 534.08M = 1.00x
Unlock overhang
lower is better, cryptorank
not scored
vesting data needs a CryptoRank Pro plan
Float
higher is better, coingecko
pct 79 vs 15
13.3% weight, +10.5
Circulating supply: 534.08M
Total supply: 534.10M
534.08M ÷ 534.10M = 100.0%
Token sink
higher is better, defillama
not scored
defillama responded but the ratio is undefined (zero denominator or no shared window)

Feature	Raw figures	Calculation	Percentile	Weight	Points
FDV / MCAP lower is better, coingecko	Total supply: 534.10M Circulating supply: 534.08M	534.10M ÷ 534.08M = 1.00x	79 vs 15 peers	13.3%	+10.5
Unlock overhang lower is better, cryptorank	n/a	vesting data needs a CryptoRank Pro plan	n/a	n/a	n/a
Float higher is better, coingecko	Circulating supply: 534.08M Total supply: 534.10M	534.08M ÷ 534.10M = 100.0%	79 vs 15 peers	13.3%	+10.5
Token sink higher is better, defillama	n/a	defillama responded but the ratio is undefined (zero denominator or no shared window)	n/a	n/a	n/a

On-chainUsage and distribution: active-address growth and holder concentration.

weight 25%, 0/2 features, domain score n/a(no data, weight redistributed)

Top-10 holders
lower is better, ethplorer
not scored
ethplorer feed off: no identifier for this token
Active-address growth
higher is better, santiment
not scored
santiment has no data for this token

Feature	Raw figures	Calculation	Percentile	Weight	Points
Top-10 holders lower is better, ethplorer	n/a	ethplorer feed off: no identifier for this token	n/a	n/a	n/a
Active-address growth higher is better, santiment	n/a	santiment has no data for this token	n/a	n/a	n/a

SocialAttention: is social interest rising ahead of price?

weight 12%, 16% of what is present, 2/3 features, domain score 45.4

Social trend
higher is better, santiment
not scored
Santiment social volume needs DYOR_SANTIMENT_API_KEY
Sentiment
higher is better, coingecko
pct 55 vs 15
8.0% weight, +4.4
Community up-votes: 84.6%
84.6% ÷ 100 = 84.6%
Watchlists
higher is better, coingecko
pct 36 vs 15
8.0% weight, +2.9
CoinGecko watchlists: 334.87K
334.87K = 334.87K

Feature	Raw figures	Calculation	Percentile	Weight	Points
Social trend higher is better, santiment	n/a	Santiment social volume needs DYOR_SANTIMENT_API_KEY	n/a	n/a	n/a
Sentiment higher is better, coingecko	Community up-votes: 84.6%	84.6% ÷ 100 = 84.6%	55 vs 15 peers	8.0%	+4.4
Watchlists higher is better, coingecko	CoinGecko watchlists: 334.87K	334.87K = 334.87K	36 vs 15 peers	8.0%	+2.9

DevelopersBuilder activity: is the team still shipping, especially in a downturn?

weight 25%, 33% of what is present, 1/1 features, domain score 21.6

Dev activity
higher is better, santiment
pct 22 vs 15
33.3% weight, +7.2
Dev-activity events in window: 10.84K
days with data: 90
10.84K ÷ 90 = 120.4/day

Feature	Raw figures	Calculation	Percentile	Weight	Points
Dev activity higher is better, santiment	Dev-activity events in window: 10.84K days with data: 90	10.84K ÷ 90 = 120.4/day	22 vs 15 peers	33.3%	+7.2

Composite

Domain	Weight	Renormalized	Domain score	Points
Fundamentals	18%	24.0%	19.7	+4.7
Tokenomics	20%	26.7%	78.6	+21.0
On-chain	25%	n/a	no data	n/a
Social	12%	16.0%	45.4	+7.3
Developers	25%	33.3%	21.6	+7.2
Raw score = Σ points				40.1

Gate: hard disqualifiers

Each rule is checked against the figures shown; missing data never trips a rule. The strictest tripped rule sets the ceiling.

unverified_contractinactive
Contract verified (Sourcify): yes, trips when False
If tripped: zeroes the score
anonymous_teaminactive
Team anonymous: n/a, trips when True
If tripped: caps the score at 40
no_auditpass
Audit on record (DefiLlama): n/a, trips when False
If tripped: caps the score at 50
extreme_fdv_mcappass
FDV / MCAP: 1.00x, trips above 10x
If tripped: caps the score at 40
dead_tokenpass
Days since last GitHub push (cosmos): 1, trips at 180 days or more
Santiment dev events in window: 10.84K, > 0 overrules a stale GitHub org
24h volume: $35.77M, trips below $1,000
If tripped: zeroes the score

No rule tripped, so the final score is the raw score: 40.1

Rule	Evidence	If tripped	Result
unverified_contract	Contract verified (Sourcify): yes, trips when False	zeroes the score	inactive
anonymous_team	Team anonymous: n/a, trips when True	caps the score at 40	inactive
no_audit	Audit on record (DefiLlama): n/a, trips when False	caps the score at 50	pass
extreme_fdv_mcap	FDV / MCAP: 1.00x, trips above 10x	caps the score at 40	pass
dead_token	Days since last GitHub push (cosmos): 1, trips at 180 days or more Santiment dev events in window: 10.84K, > 0 overrules a stale GitHub org 24h volume: $35.77M, trips below $1,000	zeroes the score	pass
No rule tripped, so the final score is the raw score			40.1

Tier

A (high conviction) 80+B (qualified) 60+C (watchlist) 40+D (avoid) 0+

40.1 maps to C (watchlist). 60% of plus or minus 20% weight perturbations keep this tier. Coverage 8/14 of this class's features (57%). medium confidence.

Peer comparison

polkadot

82.7

A (high conviction)

avalanche-2

65.1

B (qualified)

internet-computer

62.9

B (qualified)

ethereum

58.6

C (watchlist)

solana

58.5

C (watchlist)

sei-network

57.0

C (watchlist)

near

55.2

C (watchlist)

sui

53.8

C (watchlist)

cardano

45.3

C (watchlist)

the-open-network

44.4

C (watchlist)

aptos

42.5

C (watchlist)

⭐ cosmos

40.1

C (watchlist)

In one paragraph

Cosmos Hub (ATOM), L1 / platform: score 40.1/100, tier C (watchlist), rank #12 of 15 same-class peers. Domains, 0 to 100, with each one's weight in this class's composite: fundamentals 19.7/100 (weight 18%), tokenomics 78.6/100 (weight 20%), on-chain no data (its 25% weight redistributed), social 45.4/100 (weight 12%), developers 21.6/100 (weight 25%). Data coverage 8/14 features (57%), confidence medium, 60% tier-stable. Gate flags: none. All figures are already on a 0 to 100 scale; do not rescale.

About this page

This is Cosmos Hub's permanent DYOR page, scored from the board run of 2026-10-08 against 14 other L1 / platform tokens. Scores are 0 to 100; the tier maps A at 80 or above, B at 60, C at 40, D below. Every figure above shows its raw inputs, formula, percentile and weight; see the methodology for how the classes, gates and weights work. For today's numbers, run a live analysis. Research aid, not financial advice.

Other L1 / platform tokens on the board: polkadot (82.7/100), avalanche-2 (65.1/100), internet-computer (62.9/100), ethereum (58.6/100), solana (58.5/100), sei-network (57/100), near (55.2/100), sui (53.8/100). All scored tokens