๐ŸงญDYORCryptoOpsec

Internet Computer

ICPL1 / platformโœ“ verified
scored from the board run of 2026-10-08. internet-computer. Run a live analysis
๐Ÿท๏ธ Smart-contract platform: ecosystem TVL, adoption, and dev activity lead.
62.9/100
B (qualified)
coverage 71%, high confidence, 100% tier-stable, rank #3/15
Share:Post on X
Compare with other tokens
Price
$3.1
Market cap
$1.73B
FDV
$1.73B
24h volume
$59.31M
24h change
-2.9%
From ATH
-100%
Circulating
557.29M
Total supply
557.29M

Price

Loading...

Domain scores

0 to 100. Each domain is the mean of its scored features' percentiles against this asset class's reference basket; the working is tabled below.

fundamental
8.4
tokenomics
78.6
onchain
63.7
social
40.4
dev
99.5

Cross-chain & resources

Present on 0 chain(s).
Links
๐ŸฆŽ CoinGecko

Data sources

What each source supplied for this token, with a link to its own page so every figure below can be checked at the source.

coingeckook
price, market cap, supply, volume, community up-votes, watchlists, repo links
defillamaok
fees, revenue, holders revenue, TVL, audit record (protocol, or chain for an L1)
santimentok
daily active addresses (90-day trend, 30-day means) and dev-activity level (events/day over 90 days)
githubokdfinity
most recent push across the project's accounts (dead-token gate)
ethplorerok
top-10 holder shares (Ethereum ERC-20s only)
sourcifyok
contract source verification
cryptorankoff
vesting schedule / unlock overhang (Pro plan)
Key
ok: returned data for this token; it is in the score
empty: reachable, but has nothing on this token (not tracked there); scored without it
error: the request failed this run (rate limit or outage); scored without it and retried next refresh
off: not queried: no identifier for this token, or the source needs a key or plan we do not have
stale: the source failed this run; the last stored values were carried forward (dated in the advisory) so the score does not move on an outage

How the score is built

L1 / platform. Each feature is computed from the raw figures shown, then ranked as a percentile (0 to 100) against the l1 reference basket; features average within a domain; domains are weighted, with the weights renormalized over the domains that have data (a domain the class is defined by is floored, not skipped, when it has none); any gate that trips caps the result. Points are percentile times weight; they add up to the raw score.

FundamentalsValuation and cash flow: is it cheap relative to real economic activity?
weight 18%, 3/4 features, domain score 8.4
  • MC / TVL
    lower is better, defillama
    pct 17 vs 13
    6.0% weight, +1.0
    Market cap: $1.73B
    TVL: $14.62M
    $1.73B รท $14.62M = 118x
  • P/F
    lower is better, defillama
    pct 8 vs 14
    6.0% weight, +0.5
    Market cap: $1.73B
    Fees (total1y): $759.17K
    $1.73B รท $759.17K = 2276x
  • P/S
    lower is better, defillama
    pct 1 vs 13
    6.0% weight, +0.0
    Market cap: $1.73B
    Revenue (total1y): $81.74K
    $1.73B รท $81.74K = 21135x
  • Real yield
    higher is better, defillama
    not scored
    defillama responded but the ratio is undefined (zero denominator or no shared window)
TokenomicsSupply structure: dilution, unlocks, float, and value accrual to holders.
weight 20%, 2/4 features, domain score 78.6
  • FDV / MCAP
    lower is better, coingecko
    pct 79 vs 15
    10.0% weight, +7.9
    Total supply: 557.29M
    Circulating supply: 557.29M
    557.29M รท 557.29M = 1.00x
  • Unlock overhang
    lower is better, cryptorank
    not scored
    vesting data needs a CryptoRank Pro plan
  • Float
    higher is better, coingecko
    pct 79 vs 15
    10.0% weight, +7.9
    Circulating supply: 557.29M
    Total supply: 557.29M
    557.29M รท 557.29M = 100.0%
  • Token sink
    higher is better, defillama
    not scored
    defillama responded but the ratio is undefined (zero denominator or no shared window)
On-chainUsage and distribution: active-address growth and holder concentration.
weight 25%, 2/2 features, domain score 63.7
  • Top-10 holders
    lower is better, ethplorer
    pct 59 vs 3
    12.5% weight, +7.4
    Top-10 holder shares: (13.3% + 6.8% + 3.2% + 2.3% + 1.9% + 1.8% + 1.6% + 1.3% + 1.2% + 1.1%)
    ฮฃ (13.3% + 6.8% + 3.2% + 2.3% + 1.9% + 1.8% + 1.6% + 1.3% + 1.2% + 1.1%) = 34.6%
  • Active-address growth
    higher is better, santiment
    pct 69 vs 5
    12.5% weight, +8.6
    Daily active addresses, first 30-day mean: 3.05K
    Daily active addresses, last 30-day mean: 3.94K
    window: 90
    (3.94K โˆ’ 3.05K) รท 3.05K = 29.0%
SocialAttention: is social interest rising ahead of price?
weight 12%, 2/3 features, domain score 40.4
  • Social trend
    higher is better, santiment
    not scored
    Santiment social volume needs DYOR_SANTIMENT_API_KEY
  • Sentiment
    higher is better, coingecko
    pct 59 vs 15
    6.0% weight, +3.6
    Community up-votes: 87.5%
    87.5% รท 100 = 87.5%
  • Watchlists
    higher is better, coingecko
    pct 21 vs 15
    6.0% weight, +1.3
    CoinGecko watchlists: 210.93K
    210.93K = 210.93K
DevelopersBuilder activity: is the team still shipping, especially in a downturn?
weight 25%, 1/1 features, domain score 99.5
  • Dev activity
    higher is better, santiment
    pct 100 vs 15
    25.0% weight, +24.9
    Dev-activity events in window: 61.53K
    days with data: 90
    61.53K รท 90 = 683.6/day
Composite
DomainWeightRenormalizedDomain scorePoints
Fundamentals18%18.0%8.4+1.5
Tokenomics20%20.0%78.6+15.7
On-chain25%25.0%63.7+15.9
Social12%12.0%40.4+4.9
Developers25%25.0%99.5+24.9
Raw score = ฮฃ points62.9
Gate: hard disqualifiers

Each rule is checked against the figures shown; missing data never trips a rule. The strictest tripped rule sets the ceiling.

  • unverified_contractinactive
    Contract verified (Sourcify): yes, trips when False
    If tripped: zeroes the score
  • anonymous_teaminactive
    Team anonymous: n/a, trips when True
    If tripped: caps the score at 40
  • no_auditpass
    Audit on record (DefiLlama): n/a, trips when False
    If tripped: caps the score at 50
  • extreme_fdv_mcappass
    FDV / MCAP: 1.00x, trips above 10x
    If tripped: caps the score at 40
  • dead_tokenpass
    Days since last GitHub push (dfinity): 0, trips at 180 days or more
    Santiment dev events in window: 61.53K, > 0 overrules a stale GitHub org
    24h volume: $59.31M, trips below $1,000
    If tripped: zeroes the score
No rule tripped, so the final score is the raw score: 62.9
Tier
A (high conviction) 80+B (qualified) 60+C (watchlist) 40+D (avoid) 0+
62.9 maps to B (qualified). 100% of plus or minus 20% weight perturbations keep this tier. Coverage 10/14 of this class's features (71%). high confidence.

Peer comparison

polkadot
82.7
avalanche-2
65.1
โญ internet-computer
62.9
ethereum
58.6
solana
58.5
sei-network
57.0
near
55.2
sui
53.8
cardano
45.3
the-open-network
44.4
aptos
42.5
cosmos
40.1

In one paragraph

Internet Computer (ICP), L1 / platform: score 62.9/100, tier B (qualified), rank #3 of 15 same-class peers. Domains, 0 to 100, with each one's weight in this class's composite: fundamentals 8.4/100 (weight 18%), tokenomics 78.6/100 (weight 20%), on-chain 63.7/100 (weight 25%), social 40.4/100 (weight 12%), developers 99.5/100 (weight 25%). Data coverage 10/14 features (71%), confidence high, 100% tier-stable. Gate flags: none. All figures are already on a 0 to 100 scale; do not rescale.

About this page

This is Internet Computer's permanent DYOR page, scored from the board run of 2026-10-08 against 14 other L1 / platform tokens. Scores are 0 to 100; the tier maps A at 80 or above, B at 60, C at 40, D below. Every figure above shows its raw inputs, formula, percentile and weight; see the methodology for how the classes, gates and weights work. For today's numbers, run a live analysis. Research aid, not financial advice.

Other L1 / platform tokens on the board: polkadot (82.7/100), avalanche-2 (65.1/100), ethereum (58.6/100), solana (58.5/100), sei-network (57/100), near (55.2/100), sui (53.8/100), cardano (45.3/100). All scored tokens