Sei

SEIL1 / platform

scored from the board run of 2026-10-08. sei-network. Run a live analysis

🏷️ Smart-contract platform: ecosystem TVL, adoption, and dev activity lead.

57.0/100

C (watchlist)

coverage 57%, medium confidence, 100% tier-stable, rank #6/15

Share:Post on X

Compare with other tokens

Price

$0.0716

Market cap

$481.98M

FDV

$715.81M

24h volume

$36.72M

24h change

+0.7%

From ATH

-94%

Circulating

6.73B

Total supply

10.00B

Price

Domain scores

0 to 100. Each domain is the mean of its scored features' percentiles against this asset class's reference basket; the working is tabled below.

fundamental

74.0

tokenomics

14.3

social

57.1

dev

78.8

Cross-chain & resources

Present on 0 chain(s).

Links

🦎 CoinGecko

Data sources

What each source supplied for this token, with a link to its own page so every figure below can be checked at the source.

coingeckook

price, market cap, supply, volume, community up-votes, watchlists, repo links

defillamaok

fees, revenue, holders revenue, TVL, audit record (protocol, or chain for an L1)

santimentempty

daily active addresses (90-day trend, 30-day means) and dev-activity level (events/day over 90 days)

githuboksei-protocol

most recent push across the project's accounts (dead-token gate)

ethploreroff

top-10 holder shares (Ethereum ERC-20s only)

sourcifyoff

contract source verification

cryptorankoff

vesting schedule / unlock overhang (Pro plan)

Key

ok: returned data for this token; it is in the score

empty: reachable, but has nothing on this token (not tracked there); scored without it

error: the request failed this run (rate limit or outage); scored without it and retried next refresh

off: not queried: no identifier for this token, or the source needs a key or plan we do not have

stale: the source failed this run; the last stored values were carried forward (dated in the advisory) so the score does not move on an outage

How the score is built

L1 / platform. Each feature is computed from the raw figures shown, then ranked as a percentile (0 to 100) against the l1 reference basket; features average within a domain; domains are weighted, with the weights renormalized over the domains that have data (a domain the class is defined by is floored, not skipped, when it has none); any gate that trips caps the result. Points are percentile times weight; they add up to the raw score.

FundamentalsValuation and cash flow: is it cheap relative to real economic activity?

weight 18%, 24% of what is present, 3/4 features, domain score 74.0

MC / TVL
lower is better, defillama
pct 71 vs 13
8.0% weight, +5.7
Market cap: $481.98M
TVL: $34.34M
$481.98M ÷ $34.34M = 14.04x
P/F
lower is better, defillama
pct 85 vs 14
8.0% weight, +6.8
Market cap: $481.98M
Fees (total1y): $16.19M
$481.98M ÷ $16.19M = 29.77x
P/S
lower is better, defillama
pct 67 vs 13
8.0% weight, +5.3
Market cap: $481.98M
Revenue (total1y): $3.10M
$481.98M ÷ $3.10M = 155x
Real yield
higher is better, defillama
not scored
defillama responded but the ratio is undefined (zero denominator or no shared window)

Feature	Raw figures	Calculation	Percentile	Weight	Points
MC / TVL lower is better, defillama	Market cap: $481.98M TVL: $34.34M	$481.98M ÷ $34.34M = 14.04x	71 vs 13 peers	8.0%	+5.7
P/F lower is better, defillama	Market cap: $481.98M Fees (total1y): $16.19M	$481.98M ÷ $16.19M = 29.77x	85 vs 14 peers	8.0%	+6.8
P/S lower is better, defillama	Market cap: $481.98M Revenue (total1y): $3.10M	$481.98M ÷ $3.10M = 155x	67 vs 13 peers	8.0%	+5.3
Real yield higher is better, defillama	n/a	defillama responded but the ratio is undefined (zero denominator or no shared window)	n/a	n/a	n/a

TokenomicsSupply structure: dilution, unlocks, float, and value accrual to holders.

weight 20%, 27% of what is present, 2/4 features, domain score 14.3

FDV / MCAP
lower is better, coingecko
pct 14 vs 15
13.3% weight, +1.9
Total supply: 10.00B
Circulating supply: 6.73B
10.00B ÷ 6.73B = 1.49x
Unlock overhang
lower is better, cryptorank
not scored
vesting data needs a CryptoRank Pro plan
Float
higher is better, coingecko
pct 14 vs 15
13.3% weight, +1.9
Circulating supply: 6.73B
Total supply: 10.00B
6.73B ÷ 10.00B = 67.3%
Token sink
higher is better, defillama
not scored
defillama responded but the ratio is undefined (zero denominator or no shared window)

Feature	Raw figures	Calculation	Percentile	Weight	Points
FDV / MCAP lower is better, coingecko	Total supply: 10.00B Circulating supply: 6.73B	10.00B ÷ 6.73B = 1.49x	14 vs 15 peers	13.3%	+1.9
Unlock overhang lower is better, cryptorank	n/a	vesting data needs a CryptoRank Pro plan	n/a	n/a	n/a
Float higher is better, coingecko	Circulating supply: 6.73B Total supply: 10.00B	6.73B ÷ 10.00B = 67.3%	14 vs 15 peers	13.3%	+1.9
Token sink higher is better, defillama	n/a	defillama responded but the ratio is undefined (zero denominator or no shared window)	n/a	n/a	n/a

On-chainUsage and distribution: active-address growth and holder concentration.

weight 25%, 0/2 features, domain score n/a(no data, weight redistributed)

Top-10 holders
lower is better, ethplorer
not scored
ethplorer feed off: no identifier for this token
Active-address growth
higher is better, santiment
not scored
santiment has no data for this token

Feature	Raw figures	Calculation	Percentile	Weight	Points
Top-10 holders lower is better, ethplorer	n/a	ethplorer feed off: no identifier for this token	n/a	n/a	n/a
Active-address growth higher is better, santiment	n/a	santiment has no data for this token	n/a	n/a	n/a

SocialAttention: is social interest rising ahead of price?

weight 12%, 16% of what is present, 2/3 features, domain score 57.1

Social trend
higher is better, santiment
not scored
Santiment social volume needs DYOR_SANTIMENT_API_KEY
Sentiment
higher is better, coingecko
pct 100 vs 15
8.0% weight, +8.0
Community up-votes: 100.0%
100.0% ÷ 100 = 100.0%
Watchlists
higher is better, coingecko
pct 14 vs 15
8.0% weight, +1.1
CoinGecko watchlists: 182.28K
182.28K = 182.28K

Feature	Raw figures	Calculation	Percentile	Weight	Points
Social trend higher is better, santiment	n/a	Santiment social volume needs DYOR_SANTIMENT_API_KEY	n/a	n/a	n/a
Sentiment higher is better, coingecko	Community up-votes: 100.0%	100.0% ÷ 100 = 100.0%	100 vs 15 peers	8.0%	+8.0
Watchlists higher is better, coingecko	CoinGecko watchlists: 182.28K	182.28K = 182.28K	14 vs 15 peers	8.0%	+1.1

DevelopersBuilder activity: is the team still shipping, especially in a downturn?

weight 25%, 33% of what is present, 1/1 features, domain score 78.8

Dev activity
higher is better, santiment
pct 79 vs 15
33.3% weight, +26.3
Dev-activity events in window: 28.26K
days with data: 90
28.26K ÷ 90 = 314.0/day

Feature	Raw figures	Calculation	Percentile	Weight	Points
Dev activity higher is better, santiment	Dev-activity events in window: 28.26K days with data: 90	28.26K ÷ 90 = 314.0/day	79 vs 15 peers	33.3%	+26.3

Composite

Domain	Weight	Renormalized	Domain score	Points
Fundamentals	18%	24.0%	74.0	+17.8
Tokenomics	20%	26.7%	14.3	+3.8
On-chain	25%	n/a	no data	n/a
Social	12%	16.0%	57.1	+9.1
Developers	25%	33.3%	78.8	+26.3
Raw score = Σ points				57.0

Gate: hard disqualifiers

Each rule is checked against the figures shown; missing data never trips a rule. The strictest tripped rule sets the ceiling.

unverified_contractinactive
Contract verified (Sourcify): n/a, trips when False
If tripped: zeroes the score
anonymous_teaminactive
Team anonymous: n/a, trips when True
If tripped: caps the score at 40
no_auditpass
Audit on record (DefiLlama): n/a, trips when False
If tripped: caps the score at 50
extreme_fdv_mcappass
FDV / MCAP: 1.49x, trips above 10x
If tripped: caps the score at 40
dead_tokenpass
Days since last GitHub push (sei-protocol): 1, trips at 180 days or more
Santiment dev events in window: 28.26K, > 0 overrules a stale GitHub org
24h volume: $36.72M, trips below $1,000
If tripped: zeroes the score

No rule tripped, so the final score is the raw score: 57.0

Rule	Evidence	If tripped	Result
unverified_contract	Contract verified (Sourcify): n/a, trips when False	zeroes the score	inactive
anonymous_team	Team anonymous: n/a, trips when True	caps the score at 40	inactive
no_audit	Audit on record (DefiLlama): n/a, trips when False	caps the score at 50	pass
extreme_fdv_mcap	FDV / MCAP: 1.49x, trips above 10x	caps the score at 40	pass
dead_token	Days since last GitHub push (sei-protocol): 1, trips at 180 days or more Santiment dev events in window: 28.26K, > 0 overrules a stale GitHub org 24h volume: $36.72M, trips below $1,000	zeroes the score	pass
No rule tripped, so the final score is the raw score			57.0

Tier

A (high conviction) 80+B (qualified) 60+C (watchlist) 40+D (avoid) 0+

57.0 maps to C (watchlist). 100% of plus or minus 20% weight perturbations keep this tier. Coverage 8/14 of this class's features (57%). medium confidence.

Peer comparison

polkadot

82.7

A (high conviction)

avalanche-2

65.1

B (qualified)

internet-computer

62.9

B (qualified)

ethereum

58.6

C (watchlist)

solana

58.5

C (watchlist)

⭐ sei-network

57.0

C (watchlist)

near

55.2

C (watchlist)

sui

53.8

C (watchlist)

cardano

45.3

C (watchlist)

the-open-network

44.4

C (watchlist)

aptos

42.5

C (watchlist)

cosmos

40.1

C (watchlist)

In one paragraph

Sei (SEI), L1 / platform: score 57.0/100, tier C (watchlist), rank #6 of 15 same-class peers. Domains, 0 to 100, with each one's weight in this class's composite: fundamentals 74.0/100 (weight 18%), tokenomics 14.3/100 (weight 20%), on-chain no data (its 25% weight redistributed), social 57.1/100 (weight 12%), developers 78.8/100 (weight 25%). Data coverage 8/14 features (57%), confidence medium, 100% tier-stable. Gate flags: none. All figures are already on a 0 to 100 scale; do not rescale.

About this page

This is Sei's permanent DYOR page, scored from the board run of 2026-10-08 against 14 other L1 / platform tokens. Scores are 0 to 100; the tier maps A at 80 or above, B at 60, C at 40, D below. Every figure above shows its raw inputs, formula, percentile and weight; see the methodology for how the classes, gates and weights work. For today's numbers, run a live analysis. Research aid, not financial advice.

Other L1 / platform tokens on the board: polkadot (82.7/100), avalanche-2 (65.1/100), internet-computer (62.9/100), ethereum (58.6/100), solana (58.5/100), near (55.2/100), sui (53.8/100), cardano (45.3/100). All scored tokens