TRON

TRXL1 / platform

scored from the board run of 2026-10-11. tron. Run a live analysis

🏷️ Smart-contract platform: ecosystem TVL, adoption, and dev activity lead.

35.5/100

D (avoid)

coverage 57%, medium confidence, 100% tier-stable, rank #13/15

Share:Post on X

Compare with other tokens

Price

$0.330

Market cap

$31.37B

FDV

$31.37B

24h volume

$240.12M

24h change

-0.2%

From ATH

-23%

Circulating

94.99B

Total supply

94.99B

Price

Domain scores

0 to 100. Each domain is the mean of its scored features' percentiles against this asset class's reference basket; the working is tabled below.

fundamental

36.9

tokenomics

78.6

social

29.6

dev

2.8

Cross-chain & resources

Present on 0 chain(s).

Links

🦎 CoinGecko

Data sources

What each source supplied for this token, with a link to its own page so every figure below can be checked at the source.

coingeckook

price, market cap, supply, volume, community up-votes, watchlists, repo links

defillamaok

fees, revenue, holders revenue, TVL, audit record (protocol, or chain for an L1)

santimentempty

daily active addresses (90-day trend, 30-day means) and dev-activity level (events/day over 90 days)

githuboktronprotocol

most recent push across the project's accounts (dead-token gate)

ethploreroff

top-10 holder shares (Ethereum ERC-20s only)

sourcifyoff

contract source verification

cryptorankoff

vesting schedule / unlock overhang (Pro plan)

Key

ok: returned data for this token; it is in the score

empty: reachable, but has nothing on this token (not tracked there); scored without it

error: the request failed this run (rate limit or outage); scored without it and retried next refresh

off: not queried: no identifier for this token, or the source needs a key or plan we do not have

stale: the source failed this run; the last stored values were carried forward (dated in the advisory) so the score does not move on an outage

How the score is built

L1 / platform. Each feature is computed from the raw figures shown, then ranked as a percentile (0 to 100) against the l1 reference basket; features average within a domain; domains are weighted, with the weights renormalized over the domains that have data (a domain the class is defined by is floored, not skipped, when it has none); any gate that trips caps the result. Points are percentile times weight; they add up to the raw score.

FundamentalsValuation and cash flow: is it cheap relative to real economic activity?

weight 18%, 24% of what is present, 3/4 features, domain score 36.9

MC / TVL
lower is better, defillama
pct 71 vs 13
8.0% weight, +5.7
Market cap: $31.37B
TVL: $5.71B
$31.37B ÷ $5.71B = 5.49x
P/F
lower is better, defillama
pct 23 vs 14
8.0% weight, +1.8
Market cap: $31.37B
Fees (total1y): $83.02M
$31.37B ÷ $83.02M = 378x
P/S
lower is better, defillama
pct 17 vs 13
8.0% weight, +1.3
Market cap: $31.37B
Revenue (total1y): $16.37M
$31.37B ÷ $16.37M = 1916x
Real yield
higher is better, defillama
not scored
defillama responded but the ratio is undefined (zero denominator or no shared window)

Feature	Raw figures	Calculation	Percentile	Weight	Points
MC / TVL lower is better, defillama	Market cap: $31.37B TVL: $5.71B	$31.37B ÷ $5.71B = 5.49x	71 vs 13 peers	8.0%	+5.7
P/F lower is better, defillama	Market cap: $31.37B Fees (total1y): $83.02M	$31.37B ÷ $83.02M = 378x	23 vs 14 peers	8.0%	+1.8
P/S lower is better, defillama	Market cap: $31.37B Revenue (total1y): $16.37M	$31.37B ÷ $16.37M = 1916x	17 vs 13 peers	8.0%	+1.3
Real yield higher is better, defillama	n/a	defillama responded but the ratio is undefined (zero denominator or no shared window)	n/a	n/a	n/a

TokenomicsSupply structure: dilution, unlocks, float, and value accrual to holders.

weight 20%, 27% of what is present, 2/4 features, domain score 78.6

FDV / MCAP
lower is better, coingecko
pct 79 vs 15
13.3% weight, +10.5
Total supply: 94.99B
Circulating supply: 94.99B
94.99B ÷ 94.99B = 1.00x
Unlock overhang
lower is better, cryptorank
not scored
vesting data needs a CryptoRank Pro plan
Float
higher is better, coingecko
pct 79 vs 15
13.3% weight, +10.5
Circulating supply: 94.99B
Total supply: 94.99B
94.99B ÷ 94.99B = 100.0%
Token sink
higher is better, defillama
not scored
defillama responded but the ratio is undefined (zero denominator or no shared window)

Feature	Raw figures	Calculation	Percentile	Weight	Points
FDV / MCAP lower is better, coingecko	Total supply: 94.99B Circulating supply: 94.99B	94.99B ÷ 94.99B = 1.00x	79 vs 15 peers	13.3%	+10.5
Unlock overhang lower is better, cryptorank	n/a	vesting data needs a CryptoRank Pro plan	n/a	n/a	n/a
Float higher is better, coingecko	Circulating supply: 94.99B Total supply: 94.99B	94.99B ÷ 94.99B = 100.0%	79 vs 15 peers	13.3%	+10.5
Token sink higher is better, defillama	n/a	defillama responded but the ratio is undefined (zero denominator or no shared window)	n/a	n/a	n/a

On-chainUsage and distribution: active-address growth and holder concentration.

weight 25%, 0/2 features, domain score n/a(no data, weight redistributed)

Top-10 holders
lower is better, ethplorer
not scored
ethplorer feed off: no identifier for this token
Active-address growth
higher is better, santiment
not scored
santiment has no data for this token

Feature	Raw figures	Calculation	Percentile	Weight	Points
Top-10 holders lower is better, ethplorer	n/a	ethplorer feed off: no identifier for this token	n/a	n/a	n/a
Active-address growth higher is better, santiment	n/a	santiment has no data for this token	n/a	n/a	n/a

SocialAttention: is social interest rising ahead of price?

weight 12%, 16% of what is present, 2/3 features, domain score 29.6

Social trend
higher is better, santiment
not scored
Santiment social volume needs DYOR_SANTIMENT_API_KEY
Sentiment
higher is better, coingecko
pct 9 vs 15
8.0% weight, +0.7
Community up-votes: 46.1%
46.1% ÷ 100 = 46.1%
Watchlists
higher is better, coingecko
pct 50 vs 15
8.0% weight, +4.0
CoinGecko watchlists: 359.85K
359.85K = 359.85K

Feature	Raw figures	Calculation	Percentile	Weight	Points
Social trend higher is better, santiment	n/a	Santiment social volume needs DYOR_SANTIMENT_API_KEY	n/a	n/a	n/a
Sentiment higher is better, coingecko	Community up-votes: 46.1%	46.1% ÷ 100 = 46.1%	9 vs 15 peers	8.0%	+0.7
Watchlists higher is better, coingecko	CoinGecko watchlists: 359.85K	359.85K = 359.85K	50 vs 15 peers	8.0%	+4.0

DevelopersBuilder activity: is the team still shipping, especially in a downturn?

weight 25%, 33% of what is present, 1/1 features, domain score 2.8

Dev activity
higher is better, santiment
pct 3 vs 15
33.3% weight, +0.9
Dev-activity events in window: 2.83K
days with data: 90
2.83K ÷ 90 = 31.5/day

Feature	Raw figures	Calculation	Percentile	Weight	Points
Dev activity higher is better, santiment	Dev-activity events in window: 2.83K days with data: 90	2.83K ÷ 90 = 31.5/day	3 vs 15 peers	33.3%	+0.9

Composite

Domain	Weight	Renormalized	Domain score	Points
Fundamentals	18%	24.0%	36.9	+8.8
Tokenomics	20%	26.7%	78.6	+21.0
On-chain	25%	n/a	no data	n/a
Social	12%	16.0%	29.6	+4.7
Developers	25%	33.3%	2.8	+0.9
Raw score = Σ points				35.5

Gate: hard disqualifiers

Each rule is checked against the figures shown; missing data never trips a rule. The strictest tripped rule sets the ceiling.

unverified_contractinactive
Contract verified (Sourcify): n/a, trips when False
If tripped: zeroes the score
anonymous_teaminactive
Team anonymous: n/a, trips when True
If tripped: caps the score at 40
no_auditpass
Audit on record (DefiLlama): n/a, trips when False
If tripped: caps the score at 50
extreme_fdv_mcappass
FDV / MCAP: 1.00x, trips above 10x
If tripped: caps the score at 40
dead_tokenpass
Days since last GitHub push (tronprotocol): 1, trips at 180 days or more
Santiment dev events in window: 2.83K, > 0 overrules a stale GitHub org
24h volume: $240.12M, trips below $1,000
If tripped: zeroes the score

No rule tripped, so the final score is the raw score: 35.5

Rule	Evidence	If tripped	Result
unverified_contract	Contract verified (Sourcify): n/a, trips when False	zeroes the score	inactive
anonymous_team	Team anonymous: n/a, trips when True	caps the score at 40	inactive
no_audit	Audit on record (DefiLlama): n/a, trips when False	caps the score at 50	pass
extreme_fdv_mcap	FDV / MCAP: 1.00x, trips above 10x	caps the score at 40	pass
dead_token	Days since last GitHub push (tronprotocol): 1, trips at 180 days or more Santiment dev events in window: 2.83K, > 0 overrules a stale GitHub org 24h volume: $240.12M, trips below $1,000	zeroes the score	pass
No rule tripped, so the final score is the raw score			35.5

Tier

A (high conviction) 80+B (qualified) 60+C (watchlist) 40+D (avoid) 0+

35.5 maps to D (avoid). 100% of plus or minus 20% weight perturbations keep this tier. Coverage 8/14 of this class's features (57%). medium confidence.

Peer comparison

polkadot

86.0

A (high conviction)

avalanche-2

64.1

B (qualified)

internet-computer

63.0

B (qualified)

solana

60.8

B (qualified)

ethereum

54.3

C (watchlist)

sei-network

54.0

C (watchlist)

near

53.3

C (watchlist)

sui

53.1

C (watchlist)

cardano

52.3

C (watchlist)

aptos

47.4

C (watchlist)

the-open-network

44.9

C (watchlist)

cosmos

36.8

D (avoid)

In one paragraph

TRON (TRX), L1 / platform: score 35.5/100, tier D (avoid), rank #13 of 15 same-class peers. Domains, 0 to 100, with each one's weight in this class's composite: fundamentals 36.9/100 (weight 18%), tokenomics 78.6/100 (weight 20%), on-chain no data (its 25% weight redistributed), social 29.6/100 (weight 12%), developers 2.8/100 (weight 25%). Data coverage 8/14 features (57%), confidence medium, 100% tier-stable. Gate flags: none. All figures are already on a 0 to 100 scale; do not rescale.

About this page

This is TRON's permanent DYOR page, scored from the board run of 2026-10-11 against 14 other L1 / platform tokens. Scores are 0 to 100; the tier maps A at 80 or above, B at 60, C at 40, D below. Every figure above shows its raw inputs, formula, percentile and weight; see the methodology for how the classes, gates and weights work. For today's numbers, run a live analysis. Research aid, not financial advice.

Other L1 / platform tokens on the board: polkadot (86/100), avalanche-2 (64.1/100), internet-computer (63/100), solana (60.8/100), ethereum (54.3/100), sei-network (54/100), near (53.3/100), sui (53.1/100). All scored tokens