๐ŸงญDYORCryptoOpsec

Aptos

APTL1 / platform
scored from the board run of 2026-10-08. aptos. Run a live analysis
๐Ÿท๏ธ Smart-contract platform: ecosystem TVL, adoption, and dev activity lead.
42.5/100
C (watchlist)
coverage 57%, medium confidence, 100% tier-stable, rank #11/15
Share:Post on X
Compare with other tokens
Price
$0.794
Market cap
$692.02M
FDV
$960.85M
24h volume
$44.73M
24h change
+0.0%
From ATH
-96%
Circulating
871.19M
Total supply
1.21B

Price

Loading...

Domain scores

0 to 100. Each domain is the mean of its scored features' percentiles against this asset class's reference basket; the working is tabled below.

fundamental
79.6
tokenomics
21.4
social
21.0
dev
43.1

Cross-chain & resources

Present on 0 chain(s).
Links
๐ŸฆŽ CoinGecko

Data sources

What each source supplied for this token, with a link to its own page so every figure below can be checked at the source.

coingeckook
price, market cap, supply, volume, community up-votes, watchlists, repo links
defillamaok
fees, revenue, holders revenue, TVL, audit record (protocol, or chain for an L1)
santimentempty
daily active addresses (90-day trend, 30-day means) and dev-activity level (events/day over 90 days)
githubokaptos-labs
most recent push across the project's accounts (dead-token gate)
ethploreroff
top-10 holder shares (Ethereum ERC-20s only)
sourcifyoff
contract source verification
cryptorankoff
vesting schedule / unlock overhang (Pro plan)
Key
ok: returned data for this token; it is in the score
empty: reachable, but has nothing on this token (not tracked there); scored without it
error: the request failed this run (rate limit or outage); scored without it and retried next refresh
off: not queried: no identifier for this token, or the source needs a key or plan we do not have
stale: the source failed this run; the last stored values were carried forward (dated in the advisory) so the score does not move on an outage

How the score is built

L1 / platform. Each feature is computed from the raw figures shown, then ranked as a percentile (0 to 100) against the l1 reference basket; features average within a domain; domains are weighted, with the weights renormalized over the domains that have data (a domain the class is defined by is floored, not skipped, when it has none); any gate that trips caps the result. Points are percentile times weight; they add up to the raw score.

FundamentalsValuation and cash flow: is it cheap relative to real economic activity?
weight 18%, 24% of what is present, 3/4 features, domain score 79.6
  • MC / TVL
    lower is better, defillama
    pct 71 vs 13
    8.0% weight, +5.7
    Market cap: $692.02M
    TVL: $55.63M
    $692.02M รท $55.63M = 12.44x
  • P/F
    lower is better, defillama
    pct 85 vs 14
    8.0% weight, +6.8
    Market cap: $692.02M
    Fees (total1y): $22.68M
    $692.02M รท $22.68M = 30.52x
  • P/S
    lower is better, defillama
    pct 83 vs 13
    8.0% weight, +6.7
    Market cap: $692.02M
    Revenue (total1y): $6.92M
    $692.02M รท $6.92M = 100x
  • Real yield
    higher is better, defillama
    not scored
    defillama responded but the ratio is undefined (zero denominator or no shared window)
TokenomicsSupply structure: dilution, unlocks, float, and value accrual to holders.
weight 20%, 27% of what is present, 2/4 features, domain score 21.4
  • FDV / MCAP
    lower is better, coingecko
    pct 21 vs 15
    13.3% weight, +2.9
    Total supply: 1.21B
    Circulating supply: 871.19M
    1.21B รท 871.19M = 1.39x
  • Unlock overhang
    lower is better, cryptorank
    not scored
    vesting data needs a CryptoRank Pro plan
  • Float
    higher is better, coingecko
    pct 21 vs 15
    13.3% weight, +2.9
    Circulating supply: 871.19M
    Total supply: 1.21B
    871.19M รท 1.21B = 72.0%
  • Token sink
    higher is better, defillama
    not scored
    defillama responded but the ratio is undefined (zero denominator or no shared window)
On-chainUsage and distribution: active-address growth and holder concentration.
weight 25%, 0/2 features, domain score n/a(no data, weight redistributed)
  • Top-10 holders
    lower is better, ethplorer
    not scored
    ethplorer feed off: no identifier for this token
  • Active-address growth
    higher is better, santiment
    not scored
    santiment has no data for this token
SocialAttention: is social interest rising ahead of price?
weight 12%, 16% of what is present, 2/3 features, domain score 21.0
  • Social trend
    higher is better, santiment
    not scored
    Santiment social volume needs DYOR_SANTIMENT_API_KEY
  • Sentiment
    higher is better, coingecko
    pct 38 vs 15
    8.0% weight, +3.1
    Community up-votes: 80.0%
    80.0% รท 100 = 80.0%
  • Watchlists
    higher is better, coingecko
    pct 4 vs 15
    8.0% weight, +0.3
    CoinGecko watchlists: 139.31K
    139.31K = 139.31K
DevelopersBuilder activity: is the team still shipping, especially in a downturn?
weight 25%, 33% of what is present, 1/1 features, domain score 43.1
  • Dev activity
    higher is better, santiment
    pct 43 vs 15
    33.3% weight, +14.4
    Dev-activity events in window: 17.26K
    days with data: 90
    17.26K รท 90 = 191.8/day
Composite
DomainWeightRenormalizedDomain scorePoints
Fundamentals18%24.0%79.6+19.1
Tokenomics20%26.7%21.4+5.7
On-chain25%n/ano datan/a
Social12%16.0%21.0+3.4
Developers25%33.3%43.1+14.4
Raw score = ฮฃ points42.5
Gate: hard disqualifiers

Each rule is checked against the figures shown; missing data never trips a rule. The strictest tripped rule sets the ceiling.

  • unverified_contractinactive
    Contract verified (Sourcify): n/a, trips when False
    If tripped: zeroes the score
  • anonymous_teaminactive
    Team anonymous: n/a, trips when True
    If tripped: caps the score at 40
  • no_auditpass
    Audit on record (DefiLlama): n/a, trips when False
    If tripped: caps the score at 50
  • extreme_fdv_mcappass
    FDV / MCAP: 1.39x, trips above 10x
    If tripped: caps the score at 40
  • dead_tokenpass
    Days since last GitHub push (aptos-labs): 0, trips at 180 days or more
    Santiment dev events in window: 17.26K, > 0 overrules a stale GitHub org
    24h volume: $44.73M, trips below $1,000
    If tripped: zeroes the score
No rule tripped, so the final score is the raw score: 42.5
Tier
A (high conviction) 80+B (qualified) 60+C (watchlist) 40+D (avoid) 0+
42.5 maps to C (watchlist). 100% of plus or minus 20% weight perturbations keep this tier. Coverage 8/14 of this class's features (57%). medium confidence.

Peer comparison

polkadot
82.7
avalanche-2
65.1
internet-computer
62.9
ethereum
58.6
solana
58.5
sei-network
57.0
near
55.2
sui
53.8
cardano
45.3
the-open-network
44.4
โญ aptos
42.5
cosmos
40.1

In one paragraph

Aptos (APT), L1 / platform: score 42.5/100, tier C (watchlist), rank #11 of 15 same-class peers. Domains, 0 to 100, with each one's weight in this class's composite: fundamentals 79.6/100 (weight 18%), tokenomics 21.4/100 (weight 20%), on-chain no data (its 25% weight redistributed), social 21.0/100 (weight 12%), developers 43.1/100 (weight 25%). Data coverage 8/14 features (57%), confidence medium, 100% tier-stable. Gate flags: none. All figures are already on a 0 to 100 scale; do not rescale.

About this page

This is Aptos's permanent DYOR page, scored from the board run of 2026-10-08 against 14 other L1 / platform tokens. Scores are 0 to 100; the tier maps A at 80 or above, B at 60, C at 40, D below. Every figure above shows its raw inputs, formula, percentile and weight; see the methodology for how the classes, gates and weights work. For today's numbers, run a live analysis. Research aid, not financial advice.

Other L1 / platform tokens on the board: polkadot (82.7/100), avalanche-2 (65.1/100), internet-computer (62.9/100), ethereum (58.6/100), solana (58.5/100), sei-network (57/100), near (55.2/100), sui (53.8/100). All scored tokens